On 4th September 2025, Baroness Twycross, the UK Minister for Gambling, addressed the Gambling Reform Summit with a commitment to nurturing the growth of the gambling sector while enhancing consumer protection measures. Her speech sparked a lively debate among the attendees, many of whom argued that the expansion of the sector might be at odds with efforts to mitigate gambling-related harms.
The event, hosted by Peers for Gambling Reform (PGR) and chaired by Lord Foster of Bath, attracted campaigners, charity representatives, researchers on gambling harm, and individuals with direct experience. These stakeholders voiced their concerns and expectations regarding the regulatory changes proposed by the government.
Baroness Twycross opened the conference by acknowledging the complexity of her role. She explained that her primary challenge was to find a “right balance” between different perspectives on gambling reform while ensuring the UK industry remains robust. Her speech emphasized the dual objective of promoting economic contribution and safeguarding consumers, despite skepticism from some quarters. “It is a big responsibility,” she noted, “but I do want to continue with reforms that will improve consumer protection while supporting the sector that makes an important economic societal contribution.”
She recognized that many in the audience doubted the feasibility of achieving both objectives simultaneously but assured them of the government’s transparent approach. “I know most of you don’t think this is possible, but I am going to be open with you about the approach we are taking as a government,” she asserted.
A key topic in her address was the implementation of a statutory levy, which aims to streamline the funding process to support safer gambling initiatives. Twycross acknowledged the contributions of those present in shaping the levy and expressed optimism about its impact. “I think it is going to make a considerable difference,” she commented.
The statutory levy involves setting up a governance framework to ensure a smooth transition to the new funding system. This system is designed to prevent the abrupt withdrawal of support that could result from changes in funding arrangements. “Although the relevant commissioners are leading the decision making, where appropriate we want to make sure that we maintain expertise and provision of service for those who need it most,” she explained, emphasizing the importance of continuity and stability.
An independent body will be tasked with overseeing the implementation of the levy, ensuring that funds are allocated appropriately. Twycross reassured the audience, stating, “The clear governance structure will look objectively at how the levy is working and hold the commissioners to account.”
The independence of research funding was another significant concern addressed by Twycross. At an earlier parliamentary health committee hearing in April, researchers had raised alarms about the potential influence of industry-funded research, particularly the role of GambleAware. Professor Sam Chamberlain from the University of Southampton had noted, “There’s been a lack of funding from our trusted funding bodies. In pragmatic terms, the industry has been giving cash to one massive charity that then has been handing out that money to various organisations.”
Responding to these concerns, Twycross emphasized the importance of independence in research funding. She highlighted her commitment to ensuring that research is free from conflicts of interest, acknowledging the skepticism around past funding arrangements. “Independence is as important to me as it is to you,” she told the audience. Robust processes, she assured, would be established to manage and mitigate conflicts of interest, ensuring unbiased research outcomes.
The statutory levy, implemented in April, involves a new system where the Gambling Commission outlines levy rates based on operators’ licenses, with non-compliance potentially leading to license revocations. This measure underscores the government’s determination to enforce adherence and integrity within the industry.
Critics of the reform argue that despite these measures, the underlying issue remains the sector’s push for growth, which they contend is inherently at odds with harm reduction efforts. They caution that increasing gambling activities could lead to heightened risks, especially among vulnerable populations. Yet, supporters of the reform believe that a well-regulated environment, coupled with stringent consumer protection measures, can foster a sustainable industry that contributes positively to the economy.
As the debate continues, the UK government faces the challenge of balancing economic benefits with social responsibilities. The decisions made in the coming months will likely shape the future of the gambling sector, with implications for both industry stakeholders and consumers. The ongoing dialogue suggests a landscape where collaboration and transparency are crucial to reaching a consensus that satisfies economic ambitions and social welfare.
4.2/5
