Why a stated method matters
Most no deposit lists are ordered by commission. Ours is not, and that claim only means something if we publish the criteria so you can check our listings against them.
1. Licence verification
We confirm the operator holds a valid licence and check the number against the regulator’s own public register rather than trusting a footer badge. Licences we treat as meaningful include the Malta Gaming Authority, the UK Gambling Commission, and national regulators such as Denmark’s Spillemyndigheden or Sweden’s Spelinspektionen. A Curaçao licence is not automatically disqualifying but carries far weaker player protection and dispute resolution, and we say so where it applies.
2. Reading the bonus terms in full
This is where most no deposit offers fall apart. For every bonus we record:
- Wagering requirement — the multiple you must stake before withdrawal. On no deposit offers, 30x to 60x of the bonus is typical.
- Maximum cashout — the hard cap on what the bonus can ever pay out, frequently €50 to €100 regardless of what you win.
- Maximum bet while wagering — usually €5. Exceeding it once is enough for most operators to void the balance.
- Game weighting — slots normally count 100%, table games often 10% or nothing.
- Expiry — many no deposit bonuses expire within 24 to 72 hours.
- Verification — whether ID is demanded before or only after a withdrawal request.
3. Withdrawal and payment testing
We check which methods are supported for withdrawal specifically, since operators routinely accept deposit methods they will not pay out to, and record stated processing times, minimum thresholds and operator fees.
4. Complaint history
We look at how an operator behaves when a payout is disputed, using public complaint records and regulator rulings. A pattern of confiscated winnings, indefinite verification delays or retroactively applied terms keeps an operator off this site regardless of the bonus.
5. Scoring
Ratings are on a five point scale, weighted:
- Bonus value after terms — 30%
- Licensing and player protection — 25%
- Withdrawal reliability — 20%
- Game library — 15%
- Support quality — 10%, tested by asking live chat a real bonus terms question.
An operator scoring below 3.5 is not listed.
How our articles are produced
We think you should know how the words on a page were made.
Bonus listings, ratings and operator data are maintained by our team using the process above. These are the pages we stand behind directly.
Daily industry news is produced with AI assistance. Articles are drafted from reporting published by licensed industry news sources, constrained by editorial rules covering accuracy, sourcing, tone and length, and published under our editorial account rather than a personal byline. We do not present these as first-hand reporting, and we do not invent quotes, figures or events.
What we never do: fabricate player experiences, invent reviewer credentials, or publish a testimonial that no one gave. If you ever find something on this site that reads as a personal account, it is an error and we want to hear about it.
Re-checks and removals
Bonus terms change constantly. We re-verify listed offers on a rolling basis and remove operators whose terms deteriorate materially, whose licence lapses, or whose complaint pattern changes. Report anything out of date via our contact page.
More about who we are and how we are funded is on our about page.