In the fast-paced world of iGaming, gamification has emerged as a key trend transforming how players interact with games. On October 29, 2025, this dynamic was explored in depth in the iGB podcast series hosted by Dr. Eyal Loz, in collaboration with RubyPlay. The episode titled “To buy or not to buy, this is the question” featured an insightful discussion with Zoe Ebling, VP Interactive at AGS, about the current craze for gamification and its broader implications for the industry.
In recent years, gamification has become a buzzword in the iGaming sector as operators and developers constantly seek new ways to enhance user engagement. From turbo modes to opt-in jackpots, the tools designed to gamify the experience are numerous and diverse. But what does this mean for the players’ wallets, and how do these features influence their gaming behavior? These were the pressing questions that Dr. Eyal Loz set out to explore with his guest.
Zoe Ebling noted that these gamification tools serve as a double-edged sword. On the one hand, they enhance player engagement and can increase the overall time spent on a game. On the other hand, they have a significant impact on the amount players spend, often encouraging them to bet more in pursuit of immediate thrills. Dr. Eyal observed that while these tools can enhance user experience, they also pose ethical considerations about player welfare and responsible gaming practices.
Moreover, Ebling pointed out that while players are often attracted to the instant rewards provided by these features, they may not be fully aware of the long-term financial implications. The allure of turbo modes and bonus features can mask the risk of overspending—a concern that has attracted the attention of regulators. Dr. Eyal emphasized that the delicate balance between engagement and exploitation remains a contentious issue in the industry.
Regulators, according to Ebling, have a complex relationship with gamification tools. They recognize their potential to boost economic activity within the iGaming sector, but they are also wary of their potential to encourage reckless spending. This love-hate relationship is rooted in the need to protect players while fostering innovation and growth within the industry.
As the conversation progressed, Dr. Eyal and Ebling delved into the psychology behind these gamification mechanisms. The instant gratification that they offer can be likened to the psychological triggers seen in social media platforms, where users receive immediate feedback and rewards. This type of engagement, while effective, raises questions about its impact on players’ mental health and well-being.
The economic implications of gamification tools cannot be overlooked. For operators, these features translate into higher revenues and increased player retention rates. However, Dr. Eyal cautioned that this focus on short-term gains might come at the cost of long-term sustainability. Players who feel their habits are being exploited may eventually choose to leave the platform, damaging brand reputation.
From another perspective, some argue that these tools are an essential part of modern gaming, offering players more control over their experience. By opting into features like the buy-in option or ante bet, players can tailor their gaming sessions to their preferences. This customization is seen as a positive development, offering a more personalized and immersive gaming experience.
However, critics argue that this level of control is illusory. While players believe they are customizing their experience, the underlying algorithms are designed to encourage additional spending. The debate over whether these tools genuinely empower players or manipulate them remains a heated topic within the industry.
Dr. Eyal summed up the discussion by highlighting the need for a balanced approach. The iGaming industry stands at a crossroads, with gamification tools offering both opportunities and challenges. Operators and regulators must work together to ensure that these features enhance the gaming experience without compromising player welfare. The future of gamification in iGaming will depend on finding this balance.
In conclusion, the iGB podcast episode with Zoe Ebling provided valuable insights into the complex world of gamification in iGaming. As the industry continues to evolve, stakeholders must remain vigilant in their efforts to integrate these tools responsibly. The conversation underscored the importance of ongoing dialogue between operators, regulators, and players to ensure a sustainable and ethical gaming environment.





