On September 10, 2025, the proposal for The Coney, a potential $3.4 billion casino project on Coney Island, faced intense scrutiny during a tumultuous community hearing. The Coney, backed by Thor Equities and the Chickasaw Nation, is one of eight proposals vying for one of the three coveted downstate New York casino licenses. However, the second public hearing held at the Coney Island YMCA quickly descended into chaos, reflecting the deep-seated divisions within the community.
The evening began with a display of overwhelming opposition from local elected officials. Senator Steve Chan, who had previously supported a competing proposal, criticized The Coney’s backers for a lack of direct engagement. “No one ever explained the benefits to me like they did with the other projects,” he remarked, illustrating the disconnect between the developers and local representatives.
Former City Council member Ari Kagan vehemently opposed the project, arguing that it would undermine years of community progress. He painted a grim picture of what the casino could bring: “Increased congestion, more crime, especially muggings against seniors, and a rise in mental health issues. Don’t tell me about jobs—look at Atlantic City to see how many jobs really benefited locals.”
As the hearing progressed, tensions flared. Police were called in twice to maintain order as attendees shouted over one another, brandishing signs and exchanging heated words. The community advisory committee (CAC), responsible for casting a binding vote on the project by September 30, struggled to manage the boisterous crowd.
Despite the uproar, there was some initial support for The Coney, especially in the early stages of the hearing. Community members donned “Yes to The Coney” merchandise, echoing the familiar branding of Coney Island’s Nathan’s Famous. A resident named Jay shared his support, emphasizing the need for economic opportunities: “We need jobs. YGS—‘You Gotta Survive,’ and expanding with this project is how we do that.”
However, skepticism remained rampant. Allegations emerged that some supporters were financially motivated, with a rumored figure of $80 circulating among the crowd. Concerns about fairness were also raised, as some accused project supporters of monopolizing the hearing space, preventing opponents from participating.
Yet, among the chaos, some residents voiced genuine support for the project’s potential community benefits. Sheila Smalls highlighted the promise of a $200 million community trust fund and a $75 million commitment to local emergency services. “Investing in this community means a brighter future for our children,” she said, expressing hope for what the project could bring.
The absence of union representatives and business groups during the hearing further underscored the divided sentiment. Patrick Wall from Coney Island USA warned about the potential economic pitfalls, describing the casino as a pathway to financial instability for the neighborhood. “It’s going to destroy what we have left,” he pleaded, urging the CAC to reject the proposal.
With the CAC’s decision looming, the focus shifted to its members, particularly Marissa Solomon. Known for her critical stance, Solomon has been a vocal opponent of The Coney. Residents like Pat O’Brien called on other committee members to align with her. “We just need two more votes against this, and we can put this issue to rest,” he urged, highlighting the pivotal role the CAC plays in the project’s fate.
As the deadline approaches, The Coney’s backers face an uphill battle to sway community and committee opinion. The heated exchanges and passionate testimonies reflect broader concerns about urban development and community identity. Proponents argue for economic revitalization, while opponents fear cultural erosion and social disruption.
In a counterpoint, supporters of the project highlight potential job creation and economic stimulus that could benefit the broader Coney Island area. They point to revitalization efforts seen in other urban areas where casinos have driven tourism and investment. Yet, the question remains whether these benefits outweigh the potential negative impacts cited by opponents.
Ultimately, the decision rests with the CAC, whose members must navigate the contentious landscape of public opinion. With a binding vote on the horizon, the outcome will have significant implications not only for Coney Island but also for the future of New York’s downstate casino landscape. As the clock ticks down, both supporters and opponents of The Coney remain steadfast, each hoping their voices will shape the community’s future.
4.1/5
