On the final day of the legislative session, the California Assembly decisively passed Assembly Bill 831 (AB831) with a 63-0 vote, directing the bill to Governor Gavin Newsom’s desk. Authored by Assemblymember Avelino Valencia, the bill seeks to make it a misdemeanor offense to operate or knowingly support dual-currency sweepstakes sites that simulate gambling activities like casinos and sports betting. This initiative echoes similar legislative movements in other states such as Connecticut, Montana, and New Jersey which have all passed related bans this year.
Originally introduced to tackle a distinct tribal gaming issue, AB831 was transformed in the Senate this past summer to specifically target sweepstakes casinos, progressing through several committees and Senate discussions with unwavering support. The bill’s backers include the California Nations Indian Gaming Association along with many tribal entities, reflecting a significant endorsement from the state’s indigenous communities. However, dissent exists among some tribes who argue the bill might constrain their economic flexibility.
Critics of AB831 have highlighted the “gut-and-amend” approach utilized to pivot the bill’s focus as both hasty and opaque. They contend that its broad scope could inadvertently affect other sectors utilizing sweepstakes, such as popular fast-food and coffee chains like McDonald’s and Starbucks. Before the bill’s final Senate reading, an amendment was added to exempt state lottery activities and conventional sweepstakes from the proposed restrictions.
In a statement before the bill’s passage, Jeff Duncan, executive director of the Social Gaming Leadership Alliance, expressed concerns: “AB831 is a flawed and rushed bill that lacks broad tribal consensus. As Kletsel Dehe Wintun Nation, the Sherwood Valley Rancheria of Pomo Indians, the Mechoopda Indian Tribe of Chico Rancheria, and Big Lagoon Rancheria have made clear, this bill would limit economic options available to tribes and worsen already fragile economic conditions.” He suggested that California lawmakers should instead prioritize the establishment of proper regulations that support online social gaming, generate new state revenue, and protect economic opportunities for all tribes.
The crackdown on sweepstakes casinos isn’t confined to California. A nationwide increase in legislative scrutiny has seen numerous states tackle the issue head-on. Critics argue that these operators are taking advantage of legal loopholes, offering what appear to be gambling products through a dual-currency system. This system involves non-monetary “gold coins” and “sweeps coins,” the latter of which can be converted into real-money prizes, blurring the lines between legitimate sweepstakes and gambling.
Despite the passage of similar bans in six states, not all have been enacted into law. In New York, even after the Senate and Assembly approved S5935, Governor Kathy Hochul has yet to sign it. Prior to legislative approval, Attorney General Letitia James issued 26 cease-and-desist orders to sweepstakes operators, signaling strong enforcement against unregulated gambling practices.
In Louisiana, Governor Jeff Landry vetoed a similar bill, arguing that existing gaming regulations were sufficient for controlling sweepstakes operations. Subsequently, the Louisiana Gaming Control Board issued 40 cease-and-desist letters to various operators, reinforcing the state’s regulatory stance.
Other states, including Arizona and Michigan, have also ramped up enforcement, sending cease-and-desist letters to operators exploiting the dual-currency model without proper regulation. This reflects a broader trend, as states grapple with the rapidly evolving landscape of online gaming and sweepstakes.
Amid this regulatory climate, industry analysis indicates a shift in market expectations. Eilers & Krejcik Gaming revised its 2025 revenue projections for the U.S. sweepstakes market, reducing its forecast from $4.7 billion to $4 billion due to the mounting legislative and regulatory challenges. Although this still represents a 16% increase from the previous year, Eilers & Krejcik anticipates a 10% decline by 2026, as more states implement and enforce new regulations.
The conversation surrounding sweepstakes casinos illustrates the complex interplay between regulation, economic opportunity, and consumer protection. While supporters of the bans argue that they are necessary to close legal loopholes that allow simulated gambling, opponents fear unintended consequences for smaller businesses and tribal economies that rely on similar models.
As California awaits Governor Newsom’s decision, the outcome of AB831 will likely influence future legislative efforts across the country. The debate underscores the need for balanced solutions that safeguard consumers without stifling legitimate business and cultural pursuits. The evolving saga of sweepstakes casinos highlights the ongoing challenge of regulating a dynamic industry where technology often outpaces traditional regulatory frameworks.
4.2/5
