John Lewis
Cashout Blocked After Technical Glitch Identified
James Kotylak, a 42-year-old resident of Alberta, is in a dispute with 888casino over $930,000 in winnings that the operator removed from his account. The win occurred on March 16, 2026, while playing Pragmatic Play’s Floating Dragon – Year of the Snake. 888casino stated that a technical glitch in the game necessitated the removal of the funds.
Kotylak argues that the casino owed him CAD 1,267,003 in total winnings. After the win, 888casino sent 15 congratulatory emails to the player reflecting his earnings. When Kotylak attempted to cash out CAD 47,000, the request was blocked by the operator. The company cited the technical malfunction in the slot game as the reason for the suspension of the payout.
Further Spins Placed During Investigation
While 888casino investigated the glitch, the operator allowed Kotylak to continue gambling on the platform. According to the dispute details, Kotylak placed 734 additional spins on the affected game after the issue was identified. 888casino advised the player to seek an independent review through eCOGRA, a gaming certification body.
eCOGRA responded that Canadian players are currently outside of its jurisdiction. This left Kotylak without a direct regulatory recourse in his home market. He stated that he is already looking into the matter, trying to obtain documents and records of his gameplay as well as an independent adjudication service to help him resolve the case.
Gibraltar Regulator Refers Case to Judge
The Gibraltar Gaming Division intervened in May regarding the dispute. The regulator determined that there was a contractual enforceability issue requiring review by a judge. This decision shifted the resolution of the dispute from a regulatory complaint process to a legal framework.
The glitch in Floating Dragon – Year of the Snake was part of a larger technical issue across Evoke’s gambling brands. Reports indicate that 35,072 jackpots were paid in error by the machines across these brands during the period in question. 888casino is an Evoke brand, and the operator has faced similar scrutiny regarding jackpot payouts attributed to defects in the past.
Kotylak has expressed interest in legal action but noted that legal fees are currently too high for him to pursue immediately. Litigation against casinos over jackpot prizes attributed to defects has resulted in verdicts for both operators and players in previous landmark cases. The outcome of this case will depend on the judicial review of the contractual terms between the player and the operator.
Why It Matters
This dispute tests the enforceability of operator terms regarding technical glitches in regulated iGaming markets. With eCOGRA confirming it lacks jurisdiction over Canadian players, the Gibraltar Gaming Division’s referral to a judge sets a precedent for how such contractual conflicts are resolved. The scale of the error, involving over 35,000 jackpots across Evoke brands, highlights the operational risks associated with game integrity and payout validation in digital casino environments.
Looking for somewhere to play? Browse our current no deposit bonus listings, with verified codes and the full wagering terms for each offer.
